[Bug 532819] Review Request: gdouros-symbola-fonts - A symbol font

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532819


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |ozamosi at flukkost.nu
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?




--- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-11-07 10:38:36 EDT ---
Review

1. The description is particularly difficult to digest → please try to come up
with something better with upstream (not blocking). The specific reference to
Unicode 5.2 in particular will force you to change the description each time
the font and the standard are updated

2. fontlint notes "More points in a glyph than PostScript allows" → please
relay upstream (not blocking)

3. repo-font-audit notes partial script and unicode coverage → please relay
upstream (not blocking)

4. the unicode points are unusual but the style is not exotic, I'd say it's a
serif not fantasy font (not blocking)

5. It would be nice if upstream added a .txt licensing file to the zip

₪₪₪ APPROVED ₪₪₪

You can now continue from
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a

I hope the process was pleasant, and that it will inspire you to package a
other fonts for Fedora. Please do not hesitate to suggest improvements to our
organisation or documentation on the fonts mailing list.

Thank you for another contribution to our font package pool.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.