[Bug 504891] Review Request: trove - Efficient Java collections

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504891


Guido Grazioli <guido.grazioli at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |guido.grazioli at gmail.com




--- Comment #4 from Guido Grazioli <guido.grazioli at gmail.com>  2009-11-10 19:37:09 EDT ---
I'm interested in this package, Jerry are you still working on it?
Some quick things:
- renaming to trove4j seems reasonable (other distros did that also)
- prefer %global over %define
- group Development/Libraries/Java is not standard, change it to
Development/Libraries
- -javadoc subpackage should Requires: jpackage-utils too
- would packaging lastest stable ver 2.1.0 be feasible?
- as per gcj guidelines, in %%files:
%if %{with_gcj}
- %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name}
+ %attr(-,root,root) %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name}
%endif

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.