[Bug 507083] Review Request: poco - C++ class libraries for network-centric applications

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507083





--- Comment #22 from Maxim Udushlivy <udushlivy at mail.ru>  2009-11-12 14:26:39 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #21)
> 
> Please no. That would be ugly.
> 

Yes, ugly, but you said that you'd drop the "poco" toplevel package - how to do
this in a more pleasing way? Can you give an example (or reference)?

Why the full description must be in every subpackage, may be just "poco-devel"
will suffice?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.