[Bug 537587] Review Request: dspam - bayesian filtering daemon, client, library and web ui

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537587





--- Comment #13 from Nathanael Noblet <nathanael at gnat.ca>  2009-11-17 19:00:33 EDT ---
Updated version info as per the naming guidelines.

http://www.gnat.ca/dspam.spec
http://www.gnat.ca/dspam-3.9.0-0.1.BETA4.fc12.src.rpm

Nothing has changes except the version number.

About all the conditionals. I can remove them if required. However upstream
would like to stay in sync with this rpm package, so was hoping we could keep
the conditionals in there incase someone wanted to get the srpm and build with
some conditionals to get a different package. Originally the spec file had one
default of not building any of the sub packages. It has now been setup with the
most sensible defaults allowing users to pick their backend storage on fedora.

If the conditionals are a problem (I looked and saw nothing in the guidelines
about it). I can remove them, however as stated above upstream would then keep
its own copy of the spec for whatever reason and fedora users that wanted to
rebuild dspam with other options for whatever reason would have to hack the
specfile.

Let me know if conditionals like that are a no no, like I said I didn't see
anything in the guidelines about it.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.