[Bug 541491] Review Request: rubygem-ruby_parser - A ruby parser written in pure ruby

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541491





--- Comment #5 from Matthew Kent <mkent at magoazul.com>  2009-11-30 04:33:29 EDT ---
Spec URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SPECS/rubygem-ruby_parser.spec
SRPM URL:
http://magoazul.com/wip/SRPMS/rubygem-ruby_parser-2.0.4-2.fc13.src.rpm
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > What's the correct approach here, %exclude the script? Add a note about it and
> > leave dependencies as is?
> > 
> > Will go on the assumption you'd rather it be excluded.  
> 
> - If you are sure that no one would need this script, then simply
>   exclude the script. However if there may be some people who wants
>   this script, rather leave this script as it is (and also leave
>   the dependency as it is). Those who want to use this script can
>   install the needed dependency by him/herself
>   ( note that I don't know how this script is to be used, so I would
>     keep this script as it is )  

Yeah I suppose I can't be certain no one would use it. I'll leave it in.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.