[Bug 521909] Review Request: ne7ssh - SSH Library is a Secure Shell client software written in C++

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Oct 2 11:49:36 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521909





--- Comment #26 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) <pahan at hubbitus.info>  2009-10-02 07:49:34 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #25)
> There is one unwritten guideline above all others. It's called "consider common
> sense".
Only after real guidelines.

> If a -devel package included a couple of "man 3" pages for its API headers and
> also at least one large PDF file or a huge HTML tree, would you move _all_ %doc
> files into a separate -doc package?
Man file must stay in main package I though, not in -devel.

> No. Nothing in the guidelines says you must
> decide between either -devel OR -doc. You are free to move the large files into
> -doc and keep other documentation files in -devel. It's the obvious solution.
> And convenient, too. Just as you're free to put further non-development
> oriented documentation files into other sub-packages.
I don't known really. I ask in devel ml:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-October/msg00109.html

> The original idea to create a -examples package for only six tiny source files
> was a weird and unpractical idea, and I think now you just don't want to let
> loose. That's why you show resistance. ;)
What? Loose? What loose?? I'm 2 times remade it as you want! But also I want do
work as best as can. I only search best way.

> Exactly. :-) Don't treat them as good examples.  
Why? I try "consider common sense". ;)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the package-review mailing list