[Bug 527428] New: Review Request: python-remoteobjects - An Object RESTational Model

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Oct 6 11:55:00 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: python-remoteobjects - An Object RESTational Model

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527428

           Summary: Review Request: python-remoteobjects - An Object
                    RESTational Model
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: medium
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: sebastian at when.com
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
    Classification: Fedora


Spec URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/python-remoteobjects.spec
SRPM URL:
http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/python-remoteobjects-1.0-1.fc11.src.rpm
Koji Scratch Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1730270

[sebastian at localhost SRPMS]$ rpmlint -vi
python-remoteobjects-1.0-1.fc11.src.rpm 
python-remoteobjects.src: I: checking
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[sebastian at localhost noarch]$ rpmlint -vi
python-remoteobjects-1.0-1.fc11.noarch.rpm 
python-remoteobjects.noarch: I: checking
python-remoteobjects.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency python-httplib2
You must let rpm find the library dependencies by itself. Do not put unneeded
explicit Requires: tags.

1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings.

Ignoring this since it's written in Python...
This is another requirement in the effort to package TypePad Motion for Fedora.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the package-review mailing list