[Bug 502614] Review Request: stfl - STFL implements a curses-based widget set for text terminals

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Oct 8 18:11:28 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502614


Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?




--- Comment #39 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp>  2009-10-08 14:11:24 EDT ---
For -6:

* Again about sed
  - Well, still I would like to see more smart usage of sed (if
    you want to use sed instead of patch), like:
--------------------------------------------------------
sed -i.path \
 -e '/mkdir.*lib-dynload/d' \
 -e '/cp/s|lib-dynload||' \
 python/Makefile.*

sed -i.soname \
 -e 's|\(.*ln -fs.*/\)\(libstfl\.so\)$|\1\2\n\1\$(SONAME)|' \
 Makefile

sed -i.ldflags -e 's|\(-shared\)|\1 \$(LDLIBS)|' Makefile

sed -i.path -e 's|libdir=.*|libdir=%{_libdir}|' stfl.pc.in
sed -i.cflags -e 's|-Os||' Makefile
--------------------------------------------------------
    There may be more smart ways.
    ! By the way
--------------------------------------------------------
sed -i 's,libdir=${exec_prefix}/lib,libdir=${exec_prefix}/${libdir},'
stfl.pc.in
--------------------------------------------------------
      is wrong. "libdir=${exec_prefix}/${libdir}" is invalid because
      ${libdir} cannot be defined with this line 
      ( try "$ pkg-config --libs stfl " and what returns )

* Redundant macros
  - Empty %doc still remains (in -perl subpackage)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the package-review mailing list