[Bug 528150] Review Request: invulgotracker - Tasks & projects tracking tool

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Oct 10 09:31:25 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528150


Martin Gieseking <martin.gieseking at uos.de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |martin.gieseking at uos.de




--- Comment #1 from Martin Gieseking <martin.gieseking at uos.de>  2009-10-10 05:31:24 EDT ---
Some initial comments:

- according to the source file headers, the license is GPLv3+

- The files src/util.* are licensed under GPLv2+. You should ask upstream if
this is intended.

- in Source0, give a full URL to the source tarball

- remove the final dot in Summary

- append CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" CPPFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" to %configure in
order to get the debuginfo package build correctly

- use macros in the %files section and add the doc files properly

- drop INSTALL and the empty files from %doc

- drop the locale file from %files

- see the packaging guidelines how to install the .desktop file 
(http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Desktop_files)

$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-11-x86_64/result/invulgotracker-*
invulgotracker.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot Tasks & projects tracking tool.
invulgotracker.x86_64: W: summary-ended-with-dot Tasks & projects tracking
tool.
invulgotracker.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/doc/invulgotracker/NEWS
invulgotracker.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/doc/invulgotracker/README
invulgotracker.x86_64: W: non-standard-dir-in-usr doc
invulgotracker-debuginfo.x86_64: E: debuginfo-without-sources
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 3 warnings.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the package-review mailing list