[Bug 523650] Review Request: qmpdclient - A Qt4 based MPD client

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Oct 11 19:33:49 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523650





--- Comment #22 from Thomas Janssen <thomasj at fedoraproject.org>  2009-10-11 15:33:47 EDT ---
[thomas at tusdell ~]$ rpmlint srpm-review-test/qmpdclient.spec
srpm-review-test/qmpdclient.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line
48, tab: line 1)
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

[thomas at tusdell ~]$ rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/qmpdclient-*
qmpdclient-debuginfo.x86_64: E: empty-debuginfo-package
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings.

[thomas at tusdell ~]$ rpmlint -I empty-debuginfo-package
empty-debuginfo-package:
This debuginfo package contains no files.  This is often a sign of binaries
being unexpectedly stripped too early during the build, rpmbuild not being
able to strip the binaries, the package actually being a noarch one but
erratically packaged as arch dependent, or something else.  Verify what the
case is, and if there's no way to produce useful debuginfo out of it, disable
creation of the debuginfo package.

That's what i get after i recompiled your package and run rpmlint on it.
Installed package is rpmlint clean.
I have to say that my only idea is, to ask upstream if it's known or how to get
the debuginfo out..
Maybe one of the other reviewers is able to help out?

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1741049

-- 
Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the package-review mailing list