[Bug 527488] Review Request: drbd - drbd tools
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Oct 15 17:16:54 UTC 2009
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527488
--- Comment #34 from Fabio Massimo Di Nitto <fdinitto at redhat.com> 2009-10-15 13:16:52 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #32)
> Here is a listing of rpmlint warnings and errors that Fabio reported:
>
> > drbd.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary DRBD
>
> Well, it's the DRBD driver. What else is there to say? :)
>
> > drbd.src: W: strange-permission drbd.spec 0600
>
> No idea. It's 0640 here.
Interesting enough, when I unpack your rpm, it's 0600 and rpmlint catches it.
Of cource changing the permissions locally and then testing is ok.
> drbd-bash-completion.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc
> /etc/bash_completion.d/drbdadm
>
> Flagged with %config now.
hehe Ok.. I was waiting for this one.. you can say I am a bit bastard ;)
drbd-bash-completion.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag
/etc/bash_completion.d/drbdadm
> > drbd-udev.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/udev/rules.d/65-drbd.rules
>
> Flagged with %config now.
drbd-udev.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag
/etc/udev/rules.d/65-drbd.rules
>
> > drbd-utils.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /sbin/drbdsetup
> > drbd-utils.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /sbin/drbdmeta
>
> This one leaves me completely baffled.
I checked koji binaries and they are fine and yours are too. I guess I'll need
to check my environment and see why it's happening.
Don't worry about it, I am sure it's my problem. Sorry I haven't noticed it
before.
>
>
> > drbd-utils.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
>
> OK, this refers to helper scripts installing into /usr/lib/drbd. Discussed
> previously, it's my understanding that that is OK.
Yes it is.. as I mentioned, I did only copy/paste the full output to you.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the package-review
mailing list