[Bug 527488] Review Request: drbd - drbd tools

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527488





--- Comment #36 from Fabio Massimo Di Nitto <fdinitto at redhat.com>  2009-10-15 13:57:34 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #35)
> 
> As it stands, would you now consider the package mature enough for sponsor
> review?  

Yes.. I was completing the runtime tests right now:

/dev/drbd0 on /mnt type gfs2 (rw,relatime,localflocks,localcaching)

cat /proc/drbd 
version: 8.3.4 (api:88/proto:86-91)
GIT-hash: 792e28fe8928ff72c706e0a8fdbbcc10e36bbf3c build by
fabbione at daitarn-fedora.int.fabbione.net, 2009-10-15 19:14:04
 0: cs:Connected ro:Primary/Primary ds:UpToDate/UpToDate C r----
    ns:0 nr:6553364 dw:6553364 dr:204 al:0 bm:400 lo:0 pe:0 ua:0 ap:0 ep:1 wo:b
oos:0

One small note, doesn't require neither a new srpm or a new spec for this
review, the default config file is a placeholder to point to the documentation.
This is fine, but it points to the wrong directory.
/usr/share/doc/drbd/drbd.conf vs /usr/share/doc/drbd-utils-%{version}/drbd.conf
:)

IMHO it's good enough to go through a sponsor review.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.