[Bug 527488] Review Request: drbd - drbd tools
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Oct 16 05:14:17 UTC 2009
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527488
--- Comment #44 from Fabio Massimo Di Nitto <fdinitto at redhat.com> 2009-10-16 01:14:15 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #39)
> (In reply to comment #36)
> > /dev/drbd0 on /mnt type gfs2 (rw,relatime,localflocks,localcaching)
> >
> > cat /proc/drbd
> > version: 8.3.4 (api:88/proto:86-91)
> > GIT-hash: 792e28fe8928ff72c706e0a8fdbbcc10e36bbf3c build by
> > fabbione at daitarn-fedora.int.fabbione.net, 2009-10-15 19:14:04
> > 0: cs:Connected ro:Primary/Primary ds:UpToDate/UpToDate C r----
> > ns:0 nr:6553364 dw:6553364 dr:204 al:0 bm:400 lo:0 pe:0 ua:0 ap:0 ep:1 wo:b
> > oos:0
>
> Yep, that looks good. I take it the --with km build difficulties you mentioned
> earlier are resolved then.
No but I'll come back to you on those privately.
>
> > One small note, doesn't require neither a new srpm or a new spec for this
> > review, the default config file is a placeholder to point to the documentation.
> > This is fine, but it points to the wrong directory.
> > /usr/share/doc/drbd/drbd.conf vs /usr/share/doc/drbd-utils-%{version}/drbd.conf
> > :)
>
> Yeah right, and when I change it to that you pounce on me for not using
> %{_docdir}/%{name}-utils-%{version}. Called your bluff. :)
hahaha ok :)
>
> Fixed locally. I'm recklessly deeming this too minor to warrant another upload.
>
That's fine, it can wait for the final import.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the package-review
mailing list