[Bug 529466] Review Request: linbox - C++ Library for High-Performance Linear Algebra

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529466





--- Comment #9 from Thomas Spura <spurath at students.uni-mainz.de>  2009-10-18 08:11:19 EDT ---
I'm also assuming that the file is under the same license as the rest of
linbox, if no license is specified, so I let the rm -f .... out for now.

Hmm, they are not packaged anyway. Only the tests are used now in %check, if
there are licensing problems, wouldn't just remove the %check again resolve
this?
If there are no licensing problems, maybe the examples directory would belong
to the -doc package.
What do you think?


I just started a discussion upstream in the linbox-devel googlegroup and let
you know, what (and if) happens. [1]
Also about the exit call and the patches…


%changelog
- %%check
- patch for --cflags and --lflags in config

[1] http://groups.google.com/group/linbox-devel

Spec URL: http://tomspur.fedorapeople.org/review/linbox.spec
SRPM URL: http://tomspur.fedorapeople.org/review/linbox-1.1.6-4.fc11.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.