[Bug 527319] Review Request: typepad-motion - A microblogging application for building online communities

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Oct 21 06:49:19 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527319


Parag AN(पराग) <panemade at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |panemade at gmail.com
               Flag|                            |fedora-review+




--- Comment #10 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade at gmail.com>  2009-10-21 02:49:17 EDT ---
Review:
+ package builds in mock (F-13 i686).
koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1758806
+ rpmlint output for SRPM and for RPM.
typepad-motion.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency python-httplib2
==> can be ignored.
+ source files match upstream url(sha1sum)
8330b71b93503f90699c0c4f39519e94456c6534  typepad-motion-1.0.1.tar.gz
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license is open source-compatible.
+ License text is included in package.
+ %doc is present.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains code, not content.
+ no headers or static libraries.
+ no .pc file present.
+ no -devel subpackage
+ no .la files.
+ no translations are available
+ Does owns the directories it creates.
+ no scriptlets present.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ Not a GUI application

APPROVED.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the package-review mailing list