[Bug 506355] Review Request: munge - Uid 'N' Gid Emporium

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506355





--- Comment #29 from Steve Traylen <steve.traylen at cern.ch>  2009-10-21 12:01:32 EDT ---
Okay,

So the "real" solution is that slurm should not be requiring munge-libs
at all and should be requiring munge-devel and in: 

epel case)
    this would also pull in munge.
upstream case)
    this would pull in munge-libs

the result being the same.

But of course I can change the epel ones since the upstream ones are well
established and it is not bad packaging or anything, just different and
common technique. In fact there are other advantages since it enables
both i386 and x96_64 libs to be installed on x86_64 bit as well.

Please could you submit a new bug with this request. Essentially
so I have something to close as the package makes its way through
release. 

Steve

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.