[Bug 529861] Review Request: userspace-rcu - RCU (read-copy-update) in user space

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Oct 27 10:01:05 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529861





--- Comment #3 from Dan HorĂ¡k <dan at danny.cz>  2009-10-27 06:01:03 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Thanks for the review. I did the following:
> - changed the license to LGPLv2+ (my rpmlint-0.91-1.fc11.noarch did not object
>   to the previous value at all)

I used rpmlint 0.90 on the built rpms. rpmlint should work with the
authoritative list of allowed values from the "Licensing" wiki page ...

> - added %doc LICENSE to the %files of the main package

but the actual license texts (gpl-2.0.txt, lgpl-2.1.txt) + lgpl-relicensing.txt
are still missing, please add them

>   (I am considering moving the %doc README to the -devel package, as the
>   information written there is mostly developer oriented)

yes, moving the README to -devel makes sense to me

> - added the %check section to run the tests (altough the package does not
>   contain a test _suite_ per se, just a bunch of tests without any notion
>   of how they should be run).

Thanks for adding them. Did you check whether they work even in the chrooted
build environment?

> - as for the shared-lib-calls-exit warning - apparently this is not
>   an error, but a design decision of the upstream - they call exit(-1) for
>   every fatal error. I am really not sure that trying to change it is the
>   task for the packager.

The packager should be just aware of the issue and eventually discuss it with
the upstream.

> Anyway, the new .spec and .src.rpm files are at the same location (i have kept
> the release tag at 1, as the previous attempt was not published anywhere in
> Fedora).  

I am still receiving the old srpm, while the spec is updated. Can you check it?
Every published iteration of the package (even published here in bugzilla) must
have an updated version/release plus a changelog entry with summary of the
changes. The reviewer (and the community) can easily check for the changes and
it also prevents the issue with the srpm.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the package-review mailing list