[Bug 530275] Review Request: rubygem-erubis - A fast and extensible eRuby implementation

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530275


Bug 530275 depends on bug 529799, which changed state.

Bug 529799 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-abstract - Allows you to define an abstract method in Ruby
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529799

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |ERRATA



--- Comment #6 from Matthew Kent <mkent at magoazul.com>  2009-10-28 23:45:03 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)

Thanks for looking into this. Interesting issue.

> So the error messages actually change.
> 
> What I don't know currently is that whether it is strictly expected
> on usual or not that ruby returns error messages in this format.
> Do you know some reason that rubygem-erubis strictly expectes this
> format?  

Not sure honestly. Easy cut and paste solution to verify the syntax check is
working I guess?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.