[Bug 530857] Review Request: drehatlas-xaporho-fonts - latin typeface inspired by a hobby rock band logo

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530857


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |dave at adsllc.com
               Flag|                            |fedora-review+




--- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-10-29 17:30:34 EDT ---
Review:

1. typo in the description: orginaly

2. I don't think we go as far as asking to convert .ttf to .otf when upstream
chose .ttf. When upstream does both, we prefer .otf, but it's fine keeping .ttf
if it's upstream's choice. I doubt that for this particular font this will
change anything, ttf vs otf is mostly relevant for complex fonts (this is not a
criticism, the package is fine as is, just an informational note)

3. repo-font-audit notes this font could easily be extended to cover more
scripts with just a little effort (many scripts are less than ten glyphs away).
I'll attach the report if you want to relay it upstream

܈܈܈ APPROVED ܈܈܈

You can now continue from:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a

Please do not forget the wiki gardening. Thank you for another contribution to
our font package pool.

⇒ REASSIGNING

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.