[Bug 470545] Review Request: emacs-wl - Wanderlust, an advanced mail client for Emacs

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Apr 6 00:13:28 UTC 2010


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470545

Jonathan Underwood <jonathan.underwood at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jonathan.underwood at gmail.co
                   |                            |m

--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Underwood <jonathan.underwood at gmail.com> 2010-04-05 20:13:24 EDT ---
I started to review this by first doing a build in mock, however that fails:

+ cd /builddir/build/BUILD/wl-2.15.6
+ make
LISPDIR=/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/emacs-wl-2.15.6-1.fc14.x86_64//usr/share/emacs/site-lisp
PIXMAPDIR=/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/emacs-wl-2.15.6-1.fc14.x86_64//usr/share/pixmaps/wl
emacs -batch -q -no-site-file -l WL-MK -f compile-wl-package \
               
/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/emacs-wl-2.15.6-1.fc14.x86_64//usr/share/emacs/site-lisp
/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/emacs-wl-2.15.6-1.fc14.x86_64//usr/share/pixmaps/wl
Loading /builddir/build/BUILD/wl-2.15.6/WL-CFG...
Cannot open load file: install
make: *** [elc] Error 255
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.k61Uqr (%install)
RPM build errors:
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.k61Uqr (%install)
Child returncode was: 1
EXCEPTION: Command failed. See logs for output.
 # ['bash', '--login', '-c', 'rpmbuild -bb --target x86_64 --nodeps
builddir/build/SPECS/emacs-wl.spec']
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/mock/trace_decorator.py", line 70, in
trace
    result = func(*args, **kw)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list