[Bug 578290] Review Request: mj - Mah-Jong program with network option

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578290

--- Comment #9 from Klaus Grue <grue at diku.dk> 2010-04-10 17:40:05 EDT ---
I will return as soon as possible. Just a few short notes.

---

> > > mj.src: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install
> > > mj.src: W: no-buildroot-tag
> > Could you take a look at that?
> As I understand it, none of these have been needed since F-10
I agree. One should probably ignore rpmlint here.

---

> I believe the best thing is to follow the general rule from the naming
> guidelines and use the same name as the upstreams package.

I agree. It is fortunate that 'mj' is not taken (as far as I have been
able to see).

---

> I can't imagine how it could make a difference if the author
> "asserts" a right he can't surrender anyway.

Julian Bradfield lives in Edinburgh (UK). So I think this applies:

> It is important to note that authors or creators must choose
> to assert their Moral Rights (they are not automatic as
> copyright is), but at the same time, Moral Rights can never
> be assigned - they remain with the author even if he or she
> assigned the copyright to a publisher or some other organisation.

So I think Julian Bradfield knows exactly what he does. I agree
there would be no point in asserting moral rights in Scandinavia.

---

> > Why are man pages not user writable?
> It's an upstreams decision.
OK. As long as man pages are uninstallable, it must be OK that
they are not writable.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.