[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431

--- Comment #20 from Michal Ambroz <rebus at seznam.cz> 2010-04-20 09:53:04 EDT ---
Hello Tomasi,
I was following the recommendation from the licensing guidelines about using
AND in the license field:
"Fedora maintainers are highly encouraged to avoid this scenario whenever
reasonably possible, by dividing files into subpackages (subpackages can each
have their own License: field)."

Statement seems pretty strong and in this case it was low effort to separate
subpackage. Files are not linked together into one binary.
Of course if you really do want to see this packaged under single package I
will respect your opinion.

>The split would make sense for example in case of library/tools with
>different licenses split or in similar cases where the split out files can be
>reasonably useful alone.
I was rather thinking about possibility that someone can opt for installing
different set of icons to use with skipfish. (not that such set would be
available now)

Best regards
Michal Ambroz

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.