[Bug 581220] Review Request: qtsingleapplication - Qt library to start applications only once per user
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Apr 28 15:01:35 UTC 2010
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=581220
Rex Dieter <rdieter at math.unl.edu> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rdieter at math.unl.edu
Flag| |fedora-review?
Bug 581220 depends on bug 582864, which changed state.
Bug 582864 Summary: Review Request: qtlockedfile - QFile extension with advisory locking functions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=582864
What |Old Value |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA
Resolution| |ERRATA
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
--- Comment #6 from Rex Dieter <rdieter at math.unl.edu> 2010-04-28 11:01:33 EDT ---
Looks good, comments follow:
naming: good, though I'm curious why upstream tacks on _1 in the tarball name.
?
sources: ok
md5sum *.gz
902795eb13ecedbdc112f00d7ec22949 qtsingleapplication-2.6_1-opensource.tar.gz
patches: please document patches (short .spec comment will suffice) , and
preferably consult upstream about them.
$ rpmlint *.rpm x86_64/*.rpm
qtsingleapplication.src:52: W: configure-without-libdir-spec
qtsingleapplication.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm
/usr/lib64/libQtSolutions_SingleApplication-2.6.so.1.0.0 0775L
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings.
I suppose using 'install -p -m755' instead of 'cp -a' can workaround this one,
but you can choose whatever solution works best for you.
license: ok
scriptlets: ok
macros: ok
dependencies: ok
%files: ok
please address these comments, and I'll evaluate for final approval.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the package-review
mailing list