[Bug 566757] Review Request: strongswan - IKEv1 and IKEv2 based VPN suite

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566757

--- Comment #9 from Bill Nottingham <notting at redhat.com> 2010-04-28 15:29:18 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> well, they both use /etc/ipsec.d, /etc/ipsec.conf and /etc/ipsec.secrets, both
> provide /usr/sbin/ipsec and both provide a daemon named pluto that binds to the
> same port to name a few.
> 
> it would basically mean renaming almost everything to make it non-conflicting
> and tbh i don't much see the point of having both openswan and strongswan on
> the same machine.    

Right, the point being is if there's 90-95% feature overlap, why couldn't the
missing feature just be added into openswan, to save effort and confusion.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.