[Bug 476234] Review Request: mindi-busybox - Busybox version suited for Mindi

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476234

Caius 'kaio' Chance <cchance at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |cchance at redhat.com
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?,
                   |                            |needinfo?(bruno_cornec at hp.c
                   |                            |om)

--- Comment #9 from Caius 'kaio' Chance <cchance at redhat.com> 2010-04-28 22:54:37 EDT ---
MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in
bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on
that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the
corresponding ExcludeArch line. [8]

# Need a bug filed in bugzilla and put the number next to the ExcludeArch line.

MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ;
inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense.

# gcc is in exceptions which is not needed.

MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the
%find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.[9]

# Need a line "%find_lang %{name}" in %install section.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.