[Bug 585719] Review Request: wxformbuilder - The OpenSource wxWidgets Designer, GUI Builder, and RAD Tool

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Apr 29 21:25:38 UTC 2010


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=585719

--- Comment #8 from Alain PORTAL <alain.portal at univ-montp2.fr> 2010-04-29 17:25:36 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Still some work needed here:

It would be nice if you report problems once, and not only when I succeed to
fix the one you reported before...

> rpmlint:
> 
>  - E: empty-debuginfo-package.

Unable to fix :-(

>    A related note: the build process is silent and it's not possible 
>    to verify that correct build opts are being used during build.
>    Please fix both.

I found a way to make the build process more verbose, but I don't think that
help us...

>  - W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install
>    Not needed in later Fedoras?

I don't know if this is needed in later Fedora, but I sure if there is a
cleanup before, install is not possible:

+ /bin/rm -rf
/home/alain/Fedora/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/wxformbuilder-3.1.68-4.fc12.x86_64
+ install/linux/wxfb_export.sh
/home/alain/Fedora/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/wxformbuilder-3.1.68-4.fc12.x86_64/usr
mkdir: cannot create directory
`/home/alain/Fedora/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/wxformbuilder-3.1.68-4.fc12.x86_64/usr':
No such file or directory

>  - W: invalid-url URL: http://wxformbuilder.org/ BadStatusLine('',)
>    Strange, can't reproduce

I can :-(
Many problems to broese this site :-(

>  - E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
> /usr/lib64/wxformbuilder/libwxadditions-mini.so ['$ORIGIN']
>  - E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/wxformbuilder
> ['$ORIGIN/../lib/wxformbuilder']
>    Must be fixed

I don't how.

>  - W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/ld.so.conf.d/wxformbuilder.conf
>    Add %config tag in %files

Fixed

>  - W: invalid-url Source0: wxformbuilder-3.1.68.tar.bz2
>    ignore.
> 
> 
> A first look on license indicate GPLv2+, not GPLv2. More on that later.

GGPL sayed: Version 2, June 1991, not "or later"..
I would be please...

> You can use xz (tar cJvf ...) to compress the tarball, saves 10%. 

????
x is for extract...

z is for bzip, j (as I used) is for bzip2...

> And, in fact, the package don't build in koji, seems DSO related, logs here:
>   http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2140121    

Package build successfully in koji!
F12 : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2147057
F11 : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2147075

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list