[Bug 567028] Review Request: lv2-ll-plugins - Collection of LV2 plugins

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Aug 1 07:30:48 UTC 2010


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567028

David Cornette <rpm at davidcornette.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?

--- Comment #7 from David Cornette <rpm at davidcornette.com> 2010-08-01 03:30:47 EDT ---
There are a few issues to address.

Here is the output of rpmlint:
lv2-ll-plugins.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US arpeggiator ->
arpeggiate, arpeggio, appoggiatura
lv2-ll-plugins.src:39: W: configure-without-libdir-spec
lv2-ll-plugins.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US arpeggiator ->
arpeggiate, arpeggio, appoggiatura
lv2-ll-plugins.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary elven
/home/makerpm/rpmbuild/SPECS/lv2-ll-plugins.spec:39: W:
configure-without-libdir-spec

Spelling is fine.  I suppose we could file a bug against the words package if
we wanted to be helpful, but that isn't necessary.

You should email upstream about a man page.

I understand that configure isn't generated by autotools, but I am not sure
you couldn't specify libdir instead of specifying lv2plugindir.  It looks like
lv2plugindir will be set to $(libdir)/lv2 by default, so why not just set
libdir?  Am I missing something?

Since the elven package is capable of displaying some plugins with guis, should
there be .desktop files for it to start the included gui plugins?

This package needs to Require: lv2core for directory ownership.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list