[Bug 620039] Review Request: python-Enable - Drawing and interaction packages

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Aug 3 12:42:56 UTC 2010


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620039

--- Comment #4 from Chen Lei <supercyper1 at gmail.com> 2010-08-03 08:42:56 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > The license for this package is complicated, see image_LICENSE.txt, BSD and
> > LGPLv3 and Public Domain is not enough(e.g. images from cristalproject is
> > licensed under LGPLv2+).
> I've seen that. But AFAIK, LGPLv2+ + LGPLv3 kind of equals LGPLv3. But by all
> means please correct me if I am wrong
If LGPLv2+ and LGPLv3 source files are compiled into one binary, then the
license for this binary should be LGPLv3. If those files are not compiled into
one file, then they are still licensed under their original license. 

> > Doing tests in %check will pull in a lot of other ETS packages, normally I'd
> > like to do it on a local machine which is already installed the whole ETS
> > stacks. For no core python packages, I think doing tests is not a good idea,
> > because most Requires are not listed in BuildRequires.
> But you can add them as BR, as needed. AFAIK running the embedded tests is
> encouraged for all software ( unless it is prohibitive or cannot be done in
> koji)    

Right, it'll be better to do %check in spec if it's convenient to do so. This
package will pull in >200M addtional deps for tests, I don't think it's really
worth to do so.  For C/C++ packages, doing tests normally won't pull in many
additional buildrequires. However, for some python packages, I think doing
tests is impossible under some circumstance(e.g. Zope2 requires donzes of tiny
python modules, all those modules depends on a large amount of other modules,
obviously we can't do tests for all those modules).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list