[Bug 603245] Review Request: python-zmq - Software library for fast, message-based applications
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Aug 13 22:52:47 UTC 2010
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603245
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Spura <tomspur at fedoraproject.org> 2010-08-13 18:52:46 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> IMHO, the name python-zmq don't match Fedora naming guideline, though I think
> the naming guideline for python modules isn't clearly enough and cause many
> inconsistencies in the repo.
See:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageNamingGuidelines#Addon_Packages_.28python_modules.29
"""
[snip]
This makes a package name format of python-$NAME. When in doubt, use the name
of the module that you type to import it in a script.
"""
The imported module is zmq -> python-zmq
If it would be pyzmq -> python-pyzmq, but it isn't.
Or what do you mean?
> Currently, many existed py* packages(e.g. pygtk2) are already named as
> python3-py*. Maybe we should adopt python modules naming guldeine from debian,
> which seems more clear than ours.
Don't know the guidelines from debian... Maybe you could bring that up to the
guidelines commitee?
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/
Parag: Thanks for the review.
Any doubts to the name "python-zmq"?
(In reply to comment #9)
> python-zmq.src:139: W: macro-in-comment %{buildroot}
> python-zmq.src:139: W: macro-in-comment %{python3_sitearch}
> ==> If comments are only for temporary then its ok to keep them otherwise
> remove those lines from spec.
This shall remember me for enabling the testsuite as soon as python3-nose is
available. So this is partly temarary (don't know when nose will support
python3).
> - You used everywhere %{buildroot} except one place used $RPM_OPT_FLAGS"
> Please fix this
Done locally.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the package-review
mailing list