[Bug 623425] Review Request: python-pyside - Python bindings for Qt4
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Aug 17 02:40:55 UTC 2010
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623425
Chen Lei <supercyper1 at gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |a.badger at gmail.com
--- Comment #17 from Chen Lei <supercyper1 at gmail.com> 2010-08-16 22:40:54 EDT ---
Actually, I don't think Group is something we are worth discussing which is
almost useless. The fact is both Development/Languages
and Development/Libraries are used in the repo for python modules, see rpm -qg
'groupname' .
For package name, I think we should be more careful, currently python module
pkgnames in fedora are just a mess, it's not easy to find requires for a python
modules with many dependencies. Keep consistency with other distribution makes
sense, however we should not use the same name with them in some circumstance,
because debian/ubuntu/arch/gentoo don't allow [A-Z] in pkgname at all.
IMHO, since the upstream name and the namespace(module name) for this package
are both PySide, so python-PySide is the most suitable name to match FPG.
Actually, we should keep consistency with fedora existed packages over other
distributions', now we already have python3-PyQt4 in repo. FYI, some
distribution(e.g. mandriva) also use pyside as the pkgname.
>From fedora naming guideline:
Packages of python modules (thus they rely on python as a parent) use a
slightly different naming scheme. They should take into account the upstream
name of the python module. This makes a package name format of python-$NAME.
When in doubt, use the name of the module that you type to import it in a
script.
I am adding Toshio to CC for second opinion since the naming for python modules
is a bit complicated.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the package-review
mailing list