[Bug 610842] Review Request: meego-panel-devices - Meego devices panel
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Aug 18 20:04:20 UTC 2010
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=610842
Sebastian Dziallas <sebastian at when.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #7 from Sebastian Dziallas <sebastian at when.com> 2010-08-18 16:04:19 EDT ---
This looks good, with two issues remaining. Please fix the license tag and
rpmlint before importing. APPROVED.
[ OK ] specfiles match: 7af3d5c10d57d00f21faeeffc62c8c01
[ OK ] source files match upstream: 397f5e6892ef95fa526abb392c1ccc63
[ OK ] package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
[ OK ] spec is properly named, cleanly written, and uses macros consistently.
[ OK ] dist tag is present.
[ NO ] license field matches the actual license.
I think you actually want LGPLv2 instead of LGPLv2+ in the license tag.
[ OK ] license is open source-compatible.
[ OK ] license text included in package.
[ OK ] latest version is being packaged.
[ OK ] BuildRequires are proper.
[ OK ] compiler flags are appropriate.
[ OK ] %clean is present.
[ OK ] package builds in mock.
[ OK ] package installs properly.
[ OK ] debuginfo package looks complete.
[ NO ] rpmlint is silent.
meego-panel-devices.i686: W: non-conffile-in-etc
/etc/xdg/autostart/meego-power-icon.desktop
meego-panel-devices.i686: W: non-conffile-in-etc
/etc/gconf/schemas/meego-panel-devices.schemas
[ OK ] final provides and requires are sane
[ NA ] %check is present and all tests pass:
[ OK ] no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
[ OK ] owns the directories it creates.
[ OK ] doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
[ OK ] no duplicates in %files.
[ OK ] file permissions are appropriate.
[ NA ] scriptlets match those on ScriptletSnippets page.
[ OK ] code, not content.
[ OK ] documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
[ OK ] %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
[ OK ] no headers.
[ OK ] no pkgconfig files.
[ OK ] no libtool .la droppings.
[ NA ] desktop files valid and installed properly.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the package-review
mailing list