[Bug 544451] Review Request: rescene - Extracts RAR metadata and recreates RAR files

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Aug 26 16:41:01 UTC 2010


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544451

--- Comment #8 from Conrad Meyer <konrad at tylerc.org> 2010-08-26 12:41:00 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #6 and #7)
> [-] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in
> the review.
> 
> $ rpmlint *.rpm *.spec
> rescene.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) metadata -> meta data,
> meta-data, metatarsus
> rescene.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US metadata -> meta data,
> meta-data, metatarsus
> rescene.i686: E: no-binary
> rescene.i686: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
> rescene.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary rescene
> rescene.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) metadata -> meta data, meta-data,
> metatarsus
> rescene.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US metadata -> meta data,
> meta-data, metatarsus
> rescene.src:52: W: macro-in-comment %{_libdir}
> rescene.src:52: W: macro-in-comment %{name}
> rescene.spec:52: W: macro-in-comment %{_libdir}
> rescene.spec:52: W: macro-in-comment %{name}
> 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 10 warnings.
> 
> At least macro-in-comment errors must be fixed.
>
> ...
> 
> Please fix macro in comments errors. Except this package is fine.
> APPROVED.

Fixed.

> Ahh, forgot ask.
> Why you make decision name binary as rescene? On start without flags it produce
> help where name himself as ssr. I think it also should be fixed. Please rename
> binary or substitute it name in srr.cs source file with comment in spec why you
> do it.

Fair enough, fixed.

New URLs:
http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/rescene.spec
http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/rescene-1.2-2.fc13.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list