[Bug 659746] Review Request: dee - Model to synchronize multiple instances over DBus

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659746

Jef Spaleta <jspaleta at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jspaleta at gmail.com

--- Comment #2 from Jef Spaleta <jspaleta at gmail.com> 2010-12-06 14:44:44 EST ---
Just FYI, I don't think I can pass this through review until there is at least
a comment from upstream concerning the missing license headers. At least a
clarification of intention in the upstream report would be enough for me as a
archived statement on record.


That being said......

I think you have to leave the GPLv3 in the license field because the srpm does
ship with the example and test code. It's not just the binary..we do distribute
the srpm's as well and the licensing tag has to make sense for both the srpm
and the binary rpm.

-jef

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.