[Bug 588941] Review Request: pypy - Implementation of the Python language, using Python itself

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588941

--- Comment #42 from Maciej Fijalkowski <fijall at gmail.com> 2010-12-18 12:57:46 EST ---
(In reply to comment #41)
> (In reply to comment #40)
> > well, it goes into "don't ship stuff in a way that does not work" policy :)
> > 
> Note that there might be a misunderstanding here.  We're deleting the jars from
> the source tree prior to building as the policy is to not build with any
> pre-built binaries (except for bootstrapping).  It seems like the
> translator/jvm stuff is neither a pre-built binary (so doesn't need to be
> deleted) nor installed into the package that end-users install onto their
> system (so we aren't shipping it; we just don't delete it from the source as
> part of building pypy).
> 
> It would be different if we did ship the pypy directory to end users but you
> don't think that's a good idea.  (On a side note, I originally got interested
> in pypy because of the possibility of translating a somewhat pythonic language
> into javascript.  But I see that that's not going to be a supported use of
> rpython in the future.)

Ah ok! Now I understand it much better. Than "sure, go ahead, sorry for
trouble" from my side.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.