[Bug 664208] New: Review Request: ghc-fingertree - Haskell package provides generic finger-tree structure
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Dec 19 08:38:34 UTC 2010
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: ghc-fingertree - Haskell package provides generic finger-tree structure
Alias: ghc-fingertree
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664208
Summary: Review Request: ghc-fingertree - Haskell package
provides generic finger-tree structure
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002 at gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com,
fedora-haskell-list at redhat.com
Blocks: 634048
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
SRPM link:
https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-fingertree-0.0.1.0-1.fc14.src.rpm?attredirects=0&d=1
SPEC file link:
https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-fingertree.spec?attredirects=0&d=1
rpmlint output:
rpmlint -i *.rpm ../ghc-fingertree.spec
ghc-fingertree-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-fingertree-devel
Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package
itself.
ghc-fingertree-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.
ghc-fingertree-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/ghc-7.0.1/fingertree-0.0.1.0/libHSfingertree-0.0.1.0_p.a
A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If
you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a
development package.
4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the package-review
mailing list