[Bug 561391] New: Package review: openct
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Feb 3 15:45:23 UTC 2010
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Package review: openct
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561391
Summary: Package review: openct
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: ASSIGNED
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: mitr at redhat.com
ReportedBy: mitr at redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
CC: notting at redhat.com, tmraz at redhat.com,
fedora-package-review at redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Miloslav Trmač <mitr at redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag| |fedora-review?
(There probably was a review in Extras.)
* rpmlint:
> openct.src:50: W: unversioned-explicit-provides pcsc-ifd-handler
Is there a reason why this needs to be unversioned?
> openct.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/doc/openct-0.6.19/wiki/trac.css
OK
> openct.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/openct
Is this necessary?
> openct.x86_64: W: missing-lsb-keyword Required-Start in
/etc/rc.d/init.d/openct
> openct.x86_64: W: missing-lsb-keyword Required-Stop in
/etc/rc.d/init.d/openct
OK
> pcsc-lite-openct.x86_64: W: no-documentation
Probably OK
* Consider shipping NEWS
*
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment
* http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript says %{_initrddir} is
deprecated and %{_initddir} should be used
* "Description:" is mandatory in the LSB header of openct.init
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the package-review
mailing list