[Bug 561455] New: Review Request: yecht - A YAML processor based on Syck

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Feb 3 17:17:50 UTC 2010


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: yecht - A YAML processor based on Syck

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561455

           Summary: Review Request: yecht - A YAML processor based on Syck
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: medium
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: mmorsi at redhat.com
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
    Classification: Fedora
    Target Release: ---


Spec URL: http://mo.morsi.org/files/jruby/yecht.spec
SRPM URL: http://mo.morsi.org/files/jruby/yecht-0.0.2-1.fc12.src.rpm
Description: 
Yecht is a Syck port, a YAML 1.0 processor for Ruby.

Required by JRuby.

Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1959853

$ rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/yecht-0.0.2-1.fc12.i386.rpm 
yecht.i386: W: no-documentation
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

Ignoring error as no documentation is provided in the source.

$ rpmlint rpmbuild/SRPMS/yecht-0.0.2-1.fc12.src.rpm 
yecht.src:81: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package (main package)
%attr(-,root,root) %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name}
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

Ignoring this last warning as when package is noarch (eg if using java-openjdk)
the libdir file will not be included, and when the package is architecture
specific (eg when using gcj) it will be. See spec file for conditionals.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list