[Bug 563318] New: ceph - User space components of the CEPH file system
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Feb 9 20:04:56 UTC 2010
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: ceph - User space components of the CEPH file system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563318
Summary: ceph - User space components of the CEPH file system
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: jbacik at redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Ceph is a distributed network file system designed to provide excellent
performance, reliability, and scalability.
SRPM: http://people.redhat.com/jwhiter/ceph-0.18-1.fc12.src.rpm
Spec: http://people.redhat.com/jwhiter/ceph.spec
I've mockbuilt it and run rpmlint against everything it creates, I get the
following now
[root at localhost SPECS]# rpmlint /root/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/ceph*.rpm
ceph.x86_64: W: name-repeated-in-summary C CEPH
ceph.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US scalability ->
availability, sociability, inviolability
ceph.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/librados.so.1.0.0
exit at GLIBC_2.2.5
ceph.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/librados.so.1.0.0
_exit at GLIBC_2.2.5
ceph.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libceph.so.1.0.0
exit at GLIBC_2.2.5
ceph.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libceph.so.1.0.0
_exit at GLIBC_2.2.5
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings.
the exit() in shared libs can be ignored, they are special C++ classes that are
supposed to exit() when an action happens. The other two warnings are dumb.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the package-review
mailing list