[Bug 563598] Review Request: sugar-settings-manager - Settings manager for the Sugar environment

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563598

Mathieu Bridon <bochecha at fedoraproject.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Blocks|                            |182235(FE-Legal)

--- Comment #3 from Mathieu Bridon <bochecha at fedoraproject.org> 2010-02-14 06:30:16 EST ---
The licence says « MIT », which is confirmed by the « COPYING » file and the
source file headers.

However, there are two scripts (« missing » and « depcomp ») that are licensed
under the GPLv2+.

Shouldn't the license field be « MIT and GPLv2+ » instead?

I'm blocking FE-Legal on this as I'm not sure, meanwhile I'll go on with the
rest of the review.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.