[Bug 450164] Review Request: ace-tao - The ADAPTIVE Communication Environment (ACE) and The ACE ORB (TAO)

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450164

Chen Lei <supercyper at 163.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |supercyper at 163.com

--- Comment #41 from Chen Lei <supercyper at 163.com> 2010-02-17 03:11:23 EST ---
(In reply to comment #33)
> I'm afraid I'm a little burned out ...
> I've been through this three times in as many years; each time the license
> turns out to be a blocker.  I'm worried that if I invest a bunch more time it
> will prove to be a blocker again.
> More importantly, getting ACE into Fedora without TAO actually makes life
> *harder* for my clients.  They use *both* ACE and TAO and need a solution for
> both.  Getting ACE into Fedora makes it much harder to generate the TAO
> packages externally since the same build creates both.
> I think I'd rather just distribute the ACE and TAO packages the way I already
> do.  If someone else wants to try and get a subset into the Fedora repo I'd be
> happy to help in a lightweight manner.
> I'm guessing my effort would be better spent with a repository that would
> accept the TAO licenses as well; maybe Livna?  This seems like a much better
> use of my effort ...
> Apologies for not expressing this sooner ...
> Ken    

Push ace-tao to rpmfusion which provides software that the Fedora Project or
Red Hat doesn't want to ship?

See http://rpmfusion.org/FoundingPrinciples

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.