[Bug 491497] Review Request: dmapd - A server that provides DAAP and DPAP shares
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Feb 17 23:03:38 UTC 2010
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491497
--- Comment #25 from Christian Krause <chkr at plauener.de> 2010-02-17 18:03:31 EST ---
(In reply to comment #24)
> Spec URL: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/dmapd.spec
> SRPM URL: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/dmapd-0.0.22-1.fc12.src.rpm
Thanks for the new package.
> - New upstream version (fixes "service dmapd stop")
Very good - thank you very much. Starting, Restarting and Stopping of the
daemon does now work as expected.
> The issue regarding the "Unused metadata" message is partially fixed. This
> particular message has been downgraded to a debug message, so you will not see
> it unless the environment variable DMAPD_DEBUG is set. On the other hand,
> different, less common messages still exist. This is more a problem with the
> present limitations of the dmapd logging system than the package itself.
> Luckily, I am the upstream maintainer and will fix this soon. However, I would
Yes, I do still see lots of warnings if e.g. the files don't have correct id3
tags etc.
> like to get dmapd accepted into Fedora as is because the software works
> properly despite the logging issue.
Yes, I agree with you - the logging issue will not block the review. I have
re-checked all my comments and the package looks now quite good besides one
issue I've just discovered (sorry I haven't recognized this earlier):
Please enable the "User" config option by default in /etc/dmapd.conf:
------------------------
# User that dmapd will run as, current user if undefined:
User=dmapd
------------------------
This will ensure that the daemon will run per default as the intended user
"dmapd".
Once you show me a new package with this change, the package will be approved.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the package-review
mailing list