[Bug 562993] Review Request: rubygem-yard - Documentation tool for consistent and usable documentation in Ruby

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562993

Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?

--- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2010-02-18 02:24:49 EST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > * SourceURL
> >   - We usually use http://gems.rubyforge.org/gems/%{gemname}-%{version}.gem
> 
> gemcutter has recently replaced rubyforge as the default/official rubygem gem
> hosting location and thus I'm thinking we should get all our rubygem packages
> from there from now on

Thank you for information.

For -2:
* BR (BuildRequires)
  - Please use "BR: rubygem(rake)" style. ref:
    https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl#Perl_Requires_and_Provides

? %check
  $ rake spec observes 1 test failure. Is this safe to ignore?
  (If patches to fix this failure is available, please apply)

* Directory ownership issue
  - The directory %geminstdir itself is not owned by any packages.
    https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UnownedDirectories#Common_Mistakes

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.