[Bug 566686] Review Request: perl-Olson-Abbreviations - Globally unique timezones abbreviation handling
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Feb 19 18:32:40 UTC 2010
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566686
--- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl <cweyl at alumni.drew.edu> 2010-02-19 13:32:37 EST ---
Looks good.
perl(Test::Pod) should be br'ed to run the t/pod.t.
Think about including %{?perl_default_filter} by default, even if just pro
forma. It won't hurt anything and might save some pain down the line.
koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1999991
Spec looks sane, clean and consistent; license is correct (GPL+ or Artistic);
make test passes cleanly.
Source tarballs match upstream (sha1sum):
1bdcb5104e9288cc01f24343824d8646eb25c947 Olson-Abbreviations-0.02.tar.gz
1bdcb5104e9288cc01f24343824d8646eb25c947 Olson-Abbreviations-0.02.tar.gz.srpm
Final provides / requires are sane:
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
=====> perl-Olson-Abbreviations-0.02-1.fc13.noarch.rpm <=====
====> rpmlint
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
====> provides for perl-Olson-Abbreviations-0.02-1.fc13.noarch.rpm
perl(Olson::Abbreviations) = 0.02
perl-Olson-Abbreviations = 0.02-1.fc13
====> requires for perl-Olson-Abbreviations-0.02-1.fc13.noarch.rpm
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)
perl(Moose)
perl(MooseX::AttributeHelpers)
perl(MooseX::ClassAttribute)
perl(strict)
perl(warnings)
=====> perl-Olson-Abbreviations-0.02-1.fc13.src.rpm <=====
====> rpmlint
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
====> provides for perl-Olson-Abbreviations-0.02-1.fc13.src.rpm
====> requires for perl-Olson-Abbreviations-0.02-1.fc13.src.rpm
perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
perl(Moose)
perl(MooseX::AttributeHelpers)
perl(MooseX::ClassAttribute)
perl(Test::More)
APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the package-review
mailing list