[Bug 564466] Review Request: ubuntutitle-fonts - decorative font of Ubuntu logo

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=564466

--- Comment #5 from Naveen Kumar <nkumar at redhat.com> 2010-02-21 23:42:32 EST ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> 
> > I forgot to question this one. OFL v1.1 isn't on the list of valid licences, so
> > I omitted the version when I guess I should have asked upstream about this.
> 
> From the Fedora Licensing page, http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main,
> it appears that OFL v1.1 has the short name "OFL", so the spec is correct.
> 
> If you're asking about the "OFL and GPL" versus "OFL or GPL", then
> Packaging:LicensingGuidelines says that this one is "or", as the font is dual
> licensed.    

Yep, Thanks for the clarification. I think that should make it sane.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.