[Bug 540761] Review Request: deja-dup - Simple backup tool and frontend for duplicity

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Feb 24 01:42:43 UTC 2010


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540761

--- Comment #27 from Matthias Clasen <mclasen at redhat.com> 2010-02-23 20:42:37 EST ---
package name: ok
spec file name: ok
packaging guidelines: there is an instance of // in the file list somewhere.
for the rest, see the individual points below
license: ok
license field: ok
license file: ok
spec file language: ok
readable: ok
upstream source: the source url seems wrong,
http://launchpad.net/deja-dup/14/13.4/+download/deja-dup-13.4.tar.bz2 is the
correct url for 13.4. The tarball is identical to the upstream one. The latest
version is 13.91.
buildable: yes, see  above
ExcludeArch: ok
BuildRequires: scrollkeeper is missing, see above
locale handling: ok, but see above about --with-man and you might also want to
look into using --with-gnome to get language tags for omf and help files
ldconfig: ok
system libraries: ok
relocatable: no, ok
directory ownership: problematic directories:
  /etc/gconf/schemas (owned by GConf2)
  /usr/lib/nautilus/extensions-2.0 (owned by nautilus)
  /usr/share/gnome/help (owned by yelp)
  /usr/share/icons/Humanity (owned by nothing ?)
Library deps are covering gconf and nautilus, but you should probably add a dep
for yelp, and drop the Humanity icon, since we don't have the Humanity icon
theme in Fedora anyway
duplicate files: ok
file permissions: ok
%clean: ok
macro use: ok
content: permissible
large docs: ok
%doc content: ok
headers: ok
static libs: ok
pc files: ok
shared libs: ok
devel deps: ok
libtool archives: ok
gui apps: ok
%install: needs to wipe the buildroot initially
utf8 filenames: ok

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list