[Bug 566171] Review Request: libhid - A userspace USB HID acess library
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Feb 27 14:41:56 UTC 2010
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566171
--- Comment #11 from Michael Schwendt <mschwendt at gmail.com> 2010-02-27 09:41:54 EST ---
It appears to be personal preference only. A single file for each program, and
no dependency on any external DSOs. Some people like to do that even if it
isn't necessary.
Sometimes but rarely there is a reason for static linking. E.g. just recently a
tiny plugin interface library in the Package Review queue required static
linking. Its implementation used C/C++ static storage, which would be shared by
multiple plugins dlopen'ed by the same process. Only by linking the library
statically with every plugin, each plugin gets its own independent storage.
* Static Linking Considered Harmful
http://people.redhat.com/drepper/no_static_linking.html
* There is a small camp of people which like to link _special_ applications
statically,
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pertusus#On_static_library_packaging_for_numerical_and_data_processing
However, that doesn't have backup from Fedora's packaging comittee.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the package-review
mailing list