[Bug 226550] Merge Review: xcdroast

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226550





--- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola at iki.fi>  2010-01-01 12:52:26 EDT ---
After application of patch, rpmlint is clean.

When you apply the patch, be sure to modify the desktop file for the new
location of the icon.


MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a
duplicate. OK

MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used
consistently. OK
- After application of patch.
- The patch lines that have been commented out should be removed completely.

MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK
MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK
MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the 
Licensing Guidelines. OK

MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.
NEEDSWORK
- The files in src/ don't have any license statements.
- The GPLv2 COPYING is attached => assumed license is GPL+.
- Files in intl/ are under LGPLv2+.
=> License field should be "GPL+ and LGPLv2+", or the resulting "GPLv2+".

Please ask upstream to clarify license and add license headers to all source
code files.


MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL. OK
- Source URL bad, patch fixes it.
- Source matches upstream.

MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK
MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK
MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK
MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. N/A

MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package
that owns the directory. OK
- At least after application of patch.

MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK
MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK
MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK
MUST: Clean section exists. OK

MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK
- After application of patch.

MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect
runtime of application. OK
- After application of patch.

MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A
MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A
MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A
MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files
ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A
MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A
MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A
MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. OK
MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK
MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK
SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK
SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from
upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK
SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK


Apply the patch and fix the license tag, then I'll approve the review.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.