[Bug 504178] Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-fc - Future Composer input plugin for GStreamer

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504178





--- Comment #6 from Michael Schwendt <mschwendt at gmail.com>  2010-01-06 15:10:40 EDT ---
Well, either one would be fine, IMO.

With audacious-plugin-fc and audacious-plugin-xmp, some packagers complained
about not putting them into the "audacious-plugins-" namespace. :)

Hence I appended the "s" to match all other gstreamer-plugins- packages.
There's nothing in the guidelines about this. There has been only one good
rationale for appending the "s" even if it's just a single plugin: Users who
are accustomed to queries like "yum list gstreamer-plugins\*" would not see the
packages without "s".

Btw, some of the audacious-plugins-foo packages contain only a single plugin,
too.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.