[Bug 542210] Review Request: python-execnet - Elastic Python Deployment

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Jan 7 11:44:00 UTC 2010


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542210


Rakesh Pandit <rpandit at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |rpandit at redhat.com
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?




--- Comment #4 from Rakesh Pandit <rpandit at redhat.com>  2010-01-07 06:43:57 EDT ---
[-] Koji Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1907032 

>           raise child_exception
E           OSError: [Errno 13] Permission denied
/usr/lib/python2.6/subprocess.py:1126: OSError
____________________________ skipped test summary _____________________________
/builddir/build/BUILD/execnet-1.0.2/conftest.py:93: [8] Skipped: 'no jython
found'
/builddir/build/BUILD/execnet-1.0.2/conftest.py:93: [8] Skipped: 'no python2.5
found'
/builddir/build/BUILD/execnet-1.0.2/testing/test_serializer.py:20: [30]
Skipped: "can't find a 'python3' executable"
/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/py/impl/test/config.py:201: [55] Skipped: "no
'gspecs' value found"
/builddir/build/BUILD/execnet-1.0.2/conftest.py:93: [8] Skipped: 'no python3.1
found'
/builddir/build/BUILD/execnet-1.0.2/testing/test_termination.py:46: [1]
Skipped: "need 'ps' command to externally check process status"
/builddir/build/BUILD/execnet-1.0.2/conftest.py:93: [8] Skipped: 'no python2.7
found'
/builddir/build/BUILD/execnet-1.0.2/testing/test_xspec.py:99: [1] Skipped:
'cpython2.5 not found'
/builddir/build/BUILD/execnet-1.0.2/conftest.py:93: [8] Skipped: 'no pypy-c
found'
/builddir/build/BUILD/execnet-1.0.2/conftest.py:93: [8] Skipped: 'no python2.4
found'
===================== 1 tests deselected by '-test_info' ======================
====== 1 failed, 187 passed, 135 skipped, 1 deselected in 13.10 seconds =======
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.rZDWyL (%check)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.rZDWyL (%check)
RPM build errors:
Child returncode was: 1
EXCEPTION: Command failed. See logs for output.
 # ['bash', '--login', '-c', 'rpmbuild -bb --target noarch --nodeps
builddir/build/SPECS/python-execnet.spec']
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/mock/trace_decorator.py", line 70, in
trace
    result = func(*args, **kw)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/mock/util.py", line 324, in do
    raise mock.exception.Error, ("Command failed. See logs for output.\n # %s"
% (command,), child.returncode)
Error: Command failed. See logs for output.
 # ['bash', '--login', '-c', 'rpmbuild -bb --target noarch --nodeps
builddir/build/SPECS/python-execnet.spec']
LEAVE do --> EXCEPTION RAISED

May you have a look why it failed ?

[-] Log file had lot of warnings, which may be of some interest:

Log warnings:warning: Could not canonicalize hostname:
x86-01.phx2.fedoraproject.org
Log warnings:/builddir/build/BUILD/execnet-1.0.2/doc/implnotes.txt:4:
(WARNING/2) Literal block expected; none found.
Log warnings:preparing documents...
/builddir/build/BUILD/execnet-1.0.2/doc/example/test_ssh_fileserver.txt::
WARNING: document isn't included in any toctree
Log warnings:build succeeded, 3 warnings.
Log warnings:warning: no previously-included files found matching '*.orig'
Log warnings:warning: no previously-included files found matching '*.rej'
Log warnings:warning: no previously-included files matching '*.pyc' found under
directory 'execnet'
Log warnings:warning: no previously-included files matching '*$py.class' found
under directory 'execnet'
Log warnings:warning: no previously-included files matching '*.pyc' found under
directory 'testing'
Log warnings:warning: no previously-included files matching '*$py.class' found
under directory 'testing'

May you check what they mean and can they be ignored. Looks like.

Once this is done I will do a detailed review.

Thanks,

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the package-review mailing list