[Bug 553857] Review Request - pam_ldap (for an nss_ldap/pam_ldap split)

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553857

--- Comment #2 from Tomas Mraz <tmraz at redhat.com> 2010-01-12 02:40:30 EST ---
Is having separate configuration for pam_ldap and nss_ldap really a good idea?
It creates unnecessary hassle for the sysadmins and in 99% of configurations
involving both of these packages the contents of the configuration files will
be the same. I suggest adding a subpackage (either to pam_ldap or nss_ldap -
choose package which you think will be used in more cases) named for example
ldap-config which would contain just the ldap.conf and ldap.secret files. The
nss_ldap and pam_ldap packages can then require this package.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.